Nikon 17 55 Vs 16 80

You just give up a little lens speed in the mid-range to get all that. I frequently shoot at f2 and never worry about missing focus.

Nikon 17 55 Vs 16 80 - If you're looking for picture and video information related to the key word you've come to pay a visit to the ideal blog. Our website provides you with suggestions for seeing the highest quality video and image content, hunt and find more enlightening video articles and graphics that match your interests. comprises one of thousands of video collections from several sources, particularly Youtube, therefore we recommend this video that you see. It is also possible to bring about supporting this site by sharing videos and images that you like on this blog on your social networking accounts such as Facebook and Instagram or tell your closest friends share your experiences concerning the simplicity of access to downloads and the information you get on this site. This site is for them to stop by this website.

Nikon Nikkor Af S Dx 16 80 Mm F 2 8 4e Ed Vr Review Build Quality And Image Stabilization Lenstip Com

The 17-55 is still a very nice lens but heavy and minus any image stabilization.

Nikon 17 55 vs 16 80. - the 17-55 generally seems to rate higher on sites and user reviews but is substantially more expensive and older. Go for the Sigma 17-70 over the Sigma 17-55. Scary sharp at wide open.

Nikon 17-55 is overpriced and outdated for what it is. The Nikon 17-55mm f28 is a pro level lens but it doesnt have vibration reduction. The 17-55 is a fast constant-aperture pro lens built to last a lifetime while this 16-80 is an all plastic zoom with a variable aperture.

The Nikon 16-80mm f28-40 E VR DX is the first modern kit lens to hit f28 if I am not mistaken. Ouch for less than the 16-80mm alone you can currently pick up a D7100 with the 18-55mm kit lens plus the 55-300mm lens. I also believe that the overall build-quality of the 17-55 is superior to that of the 16-80.

The good news is that Nikon currently is giving 500 off the D500 16-80mm kit regularly 306995 now 256995. The price difference between the Fujinon 16-55mm and 16-80mm lenses is quite substantial though theyre both not cheap. The 16-55mm f28 is about 400 more than the 16-80mm f4 check current prices at BH Photo.

A Tale of Two Lenses. 16-80 every day of the week. The size and weight is a bit of a surprise considering the faster aperture of the new lens.

Having said that the 16-80 is still a fantastically sharp lens and if youre accustomed to shooting with an all-in-one then the extra reach on the telephoto end may be a better compromise based on what youre used to. LensHero compares the Nikon AF-S DX 16-80mm f28-4E ED VR vs the Nikon 17-55mm f28G ED-IF AF-S DX to find out which is the winner. Oct 17 2019 at 0600 PM.

16-80mm vs 17-55mm 28 for D500 Got the d500 about ten days ago. While being a crop-sensor lens and a variable aperture lens might mean it gets overlooked by some of our readers others myself included may still be interested in a pro-grade lens that offers flagship quality results in a super-compact package. Its no match for the 16-80 on the modern 20-24MP sensors.

Jun 13 2018 at 1025 PM. Versus the 35mm f18. By itself the 16-80mm boasts an MSRP of 106995.

Usually there is a reason for that. Of course my personal favorite is the Sigma 18-35 f18 Art. Fujifim 16-55 f28IF YOU LIKE THESE VIDEOS YOU CAN MAKE A NICE DONATION OF 2 OR 5 VIA PAYPAL TO EMAIL.

It had a severe back focusing issue on all of my Nikon DSLR cameras. The 16-80 lens is great but definitely nothing fantastic. The 16-80 is F4 on the long end but the VR will help with that.

- Both lenses rate highly but the do folks believe the VR on the 16-80 makes up for the loss of an extra step at the 80mm end as opposed to the full f28 on the 17-55. Nikkor 17-55 28 vs. Best fast DX midrange lensIF YOU LIKE THESE VIDEOS YOU CAN MAKE A NICE DONATION OF 2 OR 5 VIA.

For a walk around lens I would definitely get one that has VR. The 17-55 was awesome in its day but its day peaked a decade ago. I had the Nikon 16-80mm f28-4 lens but ended up returning it.

Nikkor 16-80 Lens REVIEW. The 17-55mm has no VR. The 16-80 build materials are not as robust as the 17-55.

The difference here is that the 17-55 is tougher and a little faster while the 16-80mm adds VR and more zoom but has a plastic barrel. The 17-55 will give you a 1-stop advantage in light gathering through the telephoto parts of the zoom range but the 16-80 has vibration reduction that will overcome that advantage. I recently read an article published a week ago that the D500 and old school 17-55mm 28 is the best combo for travelwalk around-dailyfood photography combo.

I have a 17-55 but am shooting it on a D500. I was in the market for a D500 so I took the bait. It has held its value quite well.

In its favor it is 28 through the full range. While its ever so slightly wider 8mm than the older 16-85mm f35-56 this new 16-80mm is also one ounce lighter 5g and a tiny bit shorter. Sharper wider longer better AF and VR.

Get more Fujifilm tips like this delivered to your inbox monthly - click here opens new window. Nikon went far in trying to build a. The 17-70 is newer and sharper at wide open at f28 than the 17-55.

Image stabilization and fixed aperture Nikon AF-S DX 16-80mm f28-4E ED VR vs 17-55mm f28G ED-IF AF-S DX - Our Analysis. Read our detailed comparison of the Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-80mm F28-4E ED VR vs Sigma 17-70mm F28-4 DC MACRO OS HSM C to find out their strengths and weaknesses and. Nikkor 17-55 f28 VS.