Nikon 16 85 Vs 18 105

My 16-85 is very satisfyingly sharp and its VRII is noticeably better than the 18-105. Nikon 18-140 VS Nikon 16-85 - Head to head comparing two lenses with photo samples taken in the same settings using Nikon D7200 in Aperture mode ISO 100 tr.

Nikon 16 85 Vs 18 105 - If you're searching for picture and video information linked to the key word you've come to pay a visit to the right blog. Our website gives you suggestions for viewing the maximum quality video and picture content, hunt and find more informative video articles and images that fit your interests. includes one of tens of thousands of video collections from several sources, especially Youtube, so we recommend this movie that you view. This blog is for them to visit this site.

Nikon 18 105mm F 3 5 5 6g Ed Vr Dx Af S Nikkor Review

The 16-85mm does not replace wide lenses like the 12-24mm.

Nikon 16 85 vs 18 105. Perfectionists those who cant stand to compromise within reason or those with a bit more in the wallet will probably feel better with the 16-85. Figure the 16-85 is going to cost at least twice as much and thats why I sold it and kept the 18-105. Its a fantastic walk-around lens and matches well with the 70-300VR.

The 16-85 was designed for greater. I got my D90 with it. I believe 70mm the 16-85 loses some of its advantage in sharpness over the 18-105--look Photozone MTFs for example.

The big difference is the build quality the 16-85 just feels better in the hand and is more robust. Rounded blades often only found on more expensive lenses improve the appearance of. About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy Safety How YouTube works Test new features Press Copyright Contact us Creators.

16-85 is clearly optimized for 16-24mm. I use the 16-85 mostly for landscapes as its super sharp fairly wide and handles outdoor scenes perfectly. Purely cost conscience or best value buyers should go for the 18-105.

I seem to shoot everything on my SLR with a 35mm f18 a 50mm f14 or a 70-300VR. Save the extra 200 and get yourself a Nikon 70-200300 or Sigma 70-200 for much better quality over the range. The net result is that the 18-105 is ever so slightly brighter at the wide end steadily increasing to a genuine 03 stops.

Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f35-56G ED VR. That was my thoughts too. However the 18-105 shot is at least a 13rd of a stop exposed more to the right--this may be what your eyes is seeing.

The 16-85 has an extra 2mm on the wide end while the 18-105 has an additional 20mm on the long end. If youre on a budget get the 18-105 VR you cant go wrong. The 18-105 VR is a great lens.

The advantage of this 16-85mm VR over the similarly priced 18-200mm VR is that this 16-85mm VR has a slightly wider wide end has less distortion has somewhat more effective VR and can be sharper at the wide end. Read our detailed comparison of the Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f35-56G ED VR vs Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f35-56G ED VR to find out their strengths and weaknesses and decide which one to. Yes the 16-85 is a bit sharper but the 18-105 VR is a very good lens.

The 16-85 can be had SH for 650 tops and the 18-200 can be had SH similarly median price of 700. Other than that Id still buy the 18-200mm VR if I was doing it again. The small difference is the range.

I got a D7100 and went and bought the Nikon 16-85 but in my tests the Nikon 18-105 is clearly sharper. Also bear in mind that the 18-105 just like the 18-55 was designed as a value lens and being Nikon its optical performance is way ahead of its price-point. 19 rows Nikon 18-105 vs 16-85.

Being a kit snob I sold the 18-105. Similar to the number of aperture blades rounded blades affect the way the light gets through to the sensor. You may find that it will be long enough for holiday shots but there will be some serious barrel distortion and pincushions which can be corrected during PP.

Light and somewhat of a telephoto. The 16-85 is only 11 wider at the wide end and the 18-105 is 23 longer at the tele end but you can always crop. However I also noticed that the 18-105 produces ever so slightly brighter images even at the same aperture on the order of about 5 max.

I had both the 18-200 and 16-85 for a short while and had a good look of the zoom range I was missing and I would gladly take the 2mm wider anytime. Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f35-56G ED VR. Ive owned both.

The 18-105 has an on-paper 03-stop advantage from 35mm on which translates into a visible but minor improvement in illumination. I did manual exposure to match them up and I am really disappointed in the 16-85. In my mind the 18-105 is the better deal.

Buzzs purple shoe on the left is sharper with the 18-105 even though I didnt focus there. In retrospect a mistake - particularly since I have still to actually use my 16-85 in anger. I used a tripod and turned off VR.

If you analyzed your shooting style where to you concentrate your shots at the wide end or at the telephoto end.

Review Of Nikon Dx Af S Nikkor 16 85mm F3 5 5 6g Ed Vr Swm If Happy