A couple of other things to consider the 24-120mm f4 currently has 85 cashback vs 45 for the 28-300mm which narrows the price difference. 70-2004 plus 17x is my choice for tele though the newer 70-300 PF is probably a better all-in-one in the same engineering philosophy as the 24-120.
Nikon 28 300 Vs 24 120 - If you're searching for picture and video information related to the keyword you have come to pay a visit to the ideal site. Our website provides you with suggestions for viewing the maximum quality video and image content, hunt and find more informative video content and images that fit your interests. includes one of tens of thousands of movie collections from various sources, particularly Youtube, therefore we recommend this video that you view. You can also bring about supporting this website by sharing videos and images that you enjoy on this site on your social networking accounts like Facebook and Instagram or educate your closest friends share your experiences concerning the simplicity of access to downloads and the information that you get on this website. This site is for them to stop by this site.
Nikon 24 120mm F 4g Ed Vr Vs Nikon 28 300mm F 3 5 5 6 Ed Vr Hands On Comparison Nikon Rumors
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f35-56G ED VR on Nikon D610 vs Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f4G ED on Nikon D610 vs Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm f35-45G ED VR on Nikon D610 COMPARISON SELECTION 3 selected items max VIEW.
Nikon 28 300 vs 24 120. I think the 28-300 is very close to the 24-120 in terms of image quality. Ive used the 24-1204 VR on the vast majority of my professional jobs actually. Both lenses have 77mm filter thread the same size as many other popular Nikon lenses.
Then I read reviews that the 24-120 is much better than the 28-300 then I read the 24-120 is not that great of a lens but I think it is fairly good. IQ wise they are very very close with the 24-120 having a little better contrast. Mine is starting to get a bit loose from overuse best guess 100k images on four bodies.
Dont know what Ken Rockwell was smoking when he said that the 28-300mm is betterhe could have simply looked at the MTF charts before making another bold statement that is not backed up by any facts. F28 28-300mm would be a huge lens plus they would charge grip for it. 24 is wide enough for most stuff 120 is long enough for everything but birding.
Need wider than 28 - then the 24-120. The 28-300 is a little bigger and heavier but not much. However if you buy grey from somewhere like panamoz the 24-120mm f4 is nearly 200 cheaper than the 28-300mm 550 vs 730 and a hell of a lot cheaper than UK after cashback.
The 24-120mm lens has Nano coating the 28-300mm doesnt. If you feel you need both wider and longer but want to minimize lens changes a 28-300 plus a 20mm prime is a lot lighter than a 24-120 any long prime 200mm or more. IMO if you want a sharp general use zoom lens and youre on the DX body the 24-120 F4 is the best thing since sliced bread.
But if for you the extra range of the 28-300 is worth the compromise then its a good all-rounder. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm F35-56G ED VR. The lens will be used as a walk around vacation lens zoos cityscapes amusement parks international travel sometimes I will use it for events where I can use flash and for family gatherings during the summer which will be in house and outside.
The zoom ring on the 24-120mm lens is much smoother than the zoom ring on the 28-300mm lens. The 28-300 is a little slower than the 24-120 acquiring initial focus because its got a longer range to cover. Nikon 28-300mm vs Nikon 24-120mm 105mm Center Similar to the Nikon 18-200mm the Nikon 24-120mm also suffers from sharpness and contrast issues beyond 105mm.
Bought on an impulse I was happy with the Nikon 28 -300 until i tried the Nikon 24-120 F4 i was blown away with this lens it is sharper faster ie locks on focus even in low light its lighter to. Only the 28-300 has a zoom lock button. Both of them track just fine once they acquire focus.
I just dont like the huge extension of the barrel when you zoom at 300mm and the inferior build quality compared to the 24-120. Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation. The Nikon 24-120mm has the maximum angle of view of 84 while the 28-300mm is 74 a whopping 10-degree difference.
The 28-300 F45-F56 is about as sharp at F8 on FX as the 24-120 is at F56 on DX. When traveling and shooting with good light I think that 28-300mm f35-56 VRII lens will be a good companion. Im a fan of the 28-300mm its lightweight and surprisingly offers a decent picture quality through out.
Nikon 24-120 f4 VR or Nikon 28-300 VRNikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 28-300mm f35-56G ED VR Zoom Le. Especially if the lens was sharp all the way around that could very well be a one lens and be done with it. Weight wise it is in between the Nikon 24-120mm f4 670grams vs Nikon 28-300mm 800g and Nikon 24-70mm f28 900g.
You can rest assured that the new Nikon 24-120mm will outperform the older 24-120mm which means that it is sharper than the 28-300mm as well. A normal lens is one that doesnt fall into another category such as wide angle or telephoto and typically has a focal length between 35mm and 70mm. Nikon 28-300mm vs Nikon 24-120mm 70mm Corner Once again the Nikon 24-120mm is sharper in the corners with a little more CA than on the 28-300mm.
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f4G ED VR. Need longer than 120 - then the 28-300. Is a normal lens.
Nikon 24 120mm F 4g Ed Vr Vs Nikon 28 300mm F 3 5 5 6 Ed Vr Hands On Comparison Nikon Rumors
Nikon 24 120mm F 4g Vr Review Lens Comparisons
Nikon 24 120mm F 4g Ed Vr Vs Nikon 28 300mm F 3 5 5 6 Ed Vr Hands On Comparison Nikon Rumors
Nikon Z 24 200mm Vs Nikon 28 300mm The All In One Lens Test Picture Quality Focus Breathing Test Youtube
Nikon Z 24 200mm Lens Review Comparison With 24 120 Vr Nikkor Youtube
Nikon 24 120mm F 4g Vr Review Lens Comparisons
Nikon 24 120 Mm F 4 Lens Review Love It Or Leave It
Nikon 24 120mm F 4g Ed Vr Vs Nikon 28 300mm F 3 5 5 6 Ed Vr Hands On Comparison Nikon Rumors
Nikon 24 120mm F 4g Ed Vr Vs Nikon 28 300mm F 3 5 5 6 Ed Vr Hands On Comparison Nikon Rumors
